Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 33.7 #49 of 339
Knowledge 7
AA OmniscienceAccuracy Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 24.3% #122 of 323+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 26.3% #24 of 323
AA Omniscience Index Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 4.4 #55 of 323
IFBench (instructions) Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 73.3% #30 of 248
EQ-Bench3 Judge-rated responses to social and emotionally nuanced scenarios, scored through the source pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,563 #7 of 53
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 34.2% #51 of 84
Mystery Game Puzzles Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 19% #39 of 65
Reasoning 5
ARC-AGI-1public evaluation Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 80.4% #38 of 64+1 versions & slices semi-private Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 77% #40 of 67
ARC-AGI-2public evaluation Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 20.8% #39 of 66+1 versions & slices semi-private Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 22.8% #42 of 69
Chess Puzzles Models choose the best next move from a novel chess position Epoch 22% #48 of 69
Math 17
MathArenaAIME 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 90% #22 of 24+14 versions & slices HMMT February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 92.4% #12 of 24Apex Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 19.8% #13 of 34Apex Shortlist Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 68.1% #17 of 30ArXivMath · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 47.5% #13 of 17ArXivMath · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 46.1% #7 of 20ArXivMath · June 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 46.5% #21 of 24ArXivMath · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 61.7% #6 of 14ArXivMath · May 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 56.7% #13 of 19BrokenArXiv · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 18.4% #12 of 15BrokenArXiv · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 10.5% #11 of 15BrokenArXiv · June 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 14.2% #22 of 24BrokenArXiv · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 12.1% #8 of 13BrokenArXiv · May 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 10.5% #15 of 18ArXivLean · June 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 8.7% #8 of 9
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 29.3% #30 of 55
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 59.2% #36 of 70
Science 3
Humanity's Last Exam Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 41.1% #41 of 339
CritPt (physics) Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 20.9% #27 of 326
SciCode Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 51.2% #48 of 142
Coding 9
Terminal-Bench4.0 Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 1% #56 of 134+1 versions & slices 2.1 Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 77.9% #26 of 156
DeepSWE1.1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition 43.8% #29 of 44+1 versions & slices 1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition Datacurve 41.5% #5 of 20
ITBench SRE IT incident tasks: diagnose and fix broken systems like a site-reliability engineer AA 42.7% #13 of 37
WebDev Arena Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,604 #24 of 97+2 versions & slices October 23, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,604 #25 of 98October 19, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,604 #24 of 97
Terminal-Bench Hard Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 50.8% #12 of 242
Agents 8
AutomationBench-AA Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 28.4% #51 of 135
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 1,227 #44 of 142
APEX-Agents Agents complete long-horizon professional-services tasks across realistic applications AA 33.7% #7 of 29
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Agents complete stateful enterprise workflows in eight domains; final database state determines success AA 42.7% #16 of 43
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 1,373 #43 of 177
τ³-benchbanking · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 3-banking-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 37.1% #10 of 21
EBR Bench Agents learn to play Earthborne Rangers across repeated playthroughs Epoch 9.5% #21 of 24
τ³-BankingAA Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 34.6% #26 of 134
Writing 20
Arena Textcreative writing · October 22, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,462 #15 of 197+16 versions & slices creative writing Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,454 #21 of 195overall Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,476 #24 of 196Chinese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,522 #21 of 198English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,475 #23 of 205French Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,478 #27 of 164German Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,471 #20 of 167instruction following Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,466 #26 of 205Japanese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,449 #22 of 152Korean Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,438 #19 of 156non-English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,458 #23 of 205Polish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,457 #25 of 142Russian Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,467 #25 of 203Spanish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,478 #12 of 168overall · October 15, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,470 #23 of 188creative writing · October 15, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,463 #14 of 187overall · October 22, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,470 #23 of 198
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 77.9% #23 of 96
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,759 #28 of 94
Lech Mazur Short-Story Judges compare stories written to ten required elements; the comparison score can be negative Lech 0.4 #20 of 45
Health & law 5
MLCR-AA Models synthesize long medical records; the headline credits concise answers judged both accurate and complete AA 12.8% #43 of 103
Vals LegalBench Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 84.1% #35 of 89
Vals MedCode Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 40.8% #49 of 78
Vals MedScribe Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 83.5% #40 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 31.3% #41 of 73
Documents 2
GDP.pdfAA all-pass Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 10.4% #60 of 135
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 78.3% #63 of 317
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 11
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 89.5% #41 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 91.9% #20 of 134
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 86.4% #62 of 131
SWE-bench VerifiedEpoch Swe Bench Verified: Agents modify real repositories to resolve the stated Verified issues Epoch 78.7% #2 of 24
SWE-rebenchall · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 57% #1 of 6+5 versions & slices Go · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 69.5% #1 of 6Java · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 51.4% #1 of 6Python · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 52% #1 of 6Rust · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 61.6% #1 of 6TypeScript · March 1, 2026 to July 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 73.3% #1 of 6
τ²-benchAA Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 99.1% #1 of 245
No benchmark matches