Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 26.1 #77 of 339
Knowledge 6
AA OmniscienceAccuracy Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 23.7% #126 of 323+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 29.9% #34 of 323
AA Omniscience Index Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 0.9 #66 of 323
IFBench (instructions) Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 76.3% #14 of 248
EQ-Bench3 Judge-rated responses to social and emotionally nuanced scenarios, scored through the source pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,539 #13 of 53
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 34% #52 of 84
Reasoning 1
Chess Puzzles Models choose the best next move from a novel chess position Epoch 20% #55 of 69
Math 18
MathArenaAIME 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 95.8% #12 of 24+14 versions & slices HMMT February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 89.4% #13 of 24Apex Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 11.5% #17 of 34Apex Shortlist Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 71.8% #12 of 30ArXivMath · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 36.3% #15 of 17ArXivMath · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 39.1% #13 of 20ArXivMath · January 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 65.2% #8 of 18ArXivMath · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 49.2% #11 of 14ArXivMath · May 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 52.5% #16 of 19BrokenArXiv · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 8.2% #14 of 15BrokenArXiv · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 9.3% #12 of 15BrokenArXiv · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 6.5% #11 of 13BrokenArXiv · May 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 10% #16 of 18ArXivLean · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 2.4% #5 of 5Project Euler Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 67.2% #5 of 11
FrontierMath Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 33.4% #11 of 40
FrontierMath Tier4 Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 12.5% #10 of 33
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 36.8% #53 of 70
Science 3
Humanity's Last Exam Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 30.1% #82 of 339
CritPt (physics) Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 4.6% #83 of 326
SciCode Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 44.8% #77 of 142
Coding 9
Terminal-Bench4.0 Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 2% #51 of 134+1 versions & slices 2.1 Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 61.8% #50 of 156
DeepSWE1.1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition 18.9% #34 of 44+1 versions & slices 1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition Datacurve 17.5% #13 of 20
ITBench SRE IT incident tasks: diagnose and fix broken systems like a site-reliability engineer AA 40.3% #17 of 37
WebDev Arena Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,508 #45 of 97+2 versions & slices October 23, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,508 #46 of 98October 19, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,508 #45 of 97
Terminal-Bench Hard Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 43.2% #25 of 242
Agents 4
AutomationBench-AA Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 20.3% #62 of 135
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 964 #60 of 142
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 1,117 #60 of 177
τ³-BankingAA Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 13.6% #75 of 134
Writing 20
Arena Textcreative writing · October 22, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,453 #23 of 197+16 versions & slices creative writing Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,447 #29 of 195overall Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,465 #36 of 196Chinese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,514 #25 of 198English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,475 #22 of 205French Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,471 #36 of 164German Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,467 #24 of 167instruction following Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,452 #34 of 205Japanese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,435 #28 of 152Korean Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,424 #29 of 156non-English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,449 #30 of 205Polish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,452 #26 of 142Russian Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,455 #33 of 203Spanish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,469 #22 of 168overall · October 15, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,462 #28 of 188creative writing · October 15, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,454 #23 of 187overall · October 22, 2026 Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,463 #28 of 198
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 73.5% #31 of 96
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,594 #45 of 94
Lech Mazur Short-Story Judges compare stories written to ten required elements; the comparison score can be negative Lech -1.1 #31 of 45
Health & law 4
Vals LegalBench Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 84.4% #29 of 89
Vals MedCode Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 41.6% #44 of 78
Vals MedScribe Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 72.3% #66 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 27.9% #48 of 73
Documents 2
GDP.pdfAA all-pass Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 8.4% #68 of 135
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 73.7% #99 of 317
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 17
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 86.8% #61 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 89.9% #35 of 134
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 93.3% #39 of 131
SWE-bench VerifiedEpoch Swe Bench Verified: Agents modify real repositories to resolve the stated Verified issues Epoch 74.2% #13 of 24
SWE-rebenchall · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 62.7% #1 of 5+11 versions & slices all · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 50.7% #3 of 5Go · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Go · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Java · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Java · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Python · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 62.7% #1 of 5Python · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 50.7% #3 of 5Rust · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Rust · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5TypeScript · February 1, 2026 to March 1, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5TypeScript · March 1, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5
τ²-benchAA Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 97.7% #9 of 245
No benchmark matches
CheaperDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpen+7%-76%$0.26Memory (4-bit): 452 GB → 458 GB+5
BetterGPT-6 Lunamax+6%-91%$0.068Function calling only with none · Chat Completions+3
CheaperMuse Spark 1.3xhigh+6%-7%$2.15Only auto tool_choice is supported+5
CheaperClaude Haiku 5.5xhigh+6%-91%$0.12Remove sampling parameters+5
CheaperGemini 3.8 Flashhigh+6%-30%*$3.49Sampling parameters are ignored+1
Kimi K2.6unstatedOpen+3%-20%$0.95 / $4Memory (4-bit): 452 GB → 616 GB