GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1Alternatives?
CheaperMuse Spark 1.3unstatedwins 53%-7%$1.25 / $4.25Only auto tool_choice is supported+5
BetterGPT-6.1 Solmaxwins 56%+86%$0.72Remove unsupported parameters+5OpenGLM 5.2unstatedsamesame$1.40 / $4.40
CheaperGemini 3.8 Flashunstatedsame-30%*$0.75 / $3.75Sampling parameters are ignored+1
CheaperDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017unstatedOpensame-76%$0.30 / $1.20Memory (4-bit): 452 GB → 458 GB+5Muse Spark 1.3unstatedwins 53%-7%$1.25 / $4.25Only auto tool_choice is supported+5Gemini 3.8 Flashunstatedsame-30%*$0.75 / $3.75Sampling parameters are ignored+1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017unstatedOpensame-76%$0.30 / $1.20Memory (4-bit): 452 GB → 458 GB+5Gemini 3.6 Flashunstatedsame-30%*$0.75 / $3.75
Step 3.7 FlashunstatedOpensame-80%$0.20 / $1.15GPT-6.1 Solmaxwins 56%+86%$0.72Remove unsupported parameters+5GPT-6 Astralowwins 55%+830%$0.82Monitoring can return HTTP 403+2GPT-6 Solmaxwins 55%+86%$1.04
Claude Opus 5.5highwins 54%+272%$1.82No forced tool use+5Claude Fable 5.1maxwins 55%+830%$7.63Replace forced tool_choice+5GLM 5.2unstatedOpensamesame$1.40 / $4.40DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017unstatedOpensame-76%$0.30 / $1.20Memory (4-bit): 452 GB → 458 GB+5Step 3.7 FlashunstatedOpensame-80%$0.20 / $1.15
Qwen3.5 2BunstatedOpenwins 44%-98%$0.02 / $0.10GLM 5.2unstatedOpensame—$1.40 / $4.40GLM 5.3 FlashmaxOpenn/a—$0.28Defaults to max · Self-hosted+4GLM 5.3lowOpenn/a—$0.85Reasoning cannot be disabled+3GLM 5V Turbothinkingn/a—$1.20 / $4GLM 5 Turbothinkingn/a—$1.20 / $4GLM 5thinkingOpenn/a—$1 / $3.20GLM 4.7 FlashthinkingOpenn/a—$0.061 / $0.40Context: 203K → 200KGLM 4.7thinkingOpenn/a—$0.60 / $2.20All Z.ai models →Run it yourself
estimateHistory
10 versionsBenchmarks
in Chat & KnowledgeFAQ
How much does GLM 5.1 cost?›
$1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens; cached input $0.26 per 1M; cheapest via lab-qwen at $0.82 / $3.30. A typical benchmark task costs about $1.02 at default effort.
Is GLM 5.1 free to use?›
There is no free API; the cheapest paid price is $0.82 per 1M input tokens. The weights are open, so you can run it yourself.
How good is GLM 5.1, and what is it best at?›
#80 of 334 in Chat & Knowledge, #49 of 132 in Coding, #60 of 133 in Agents & Tool Use, #29 of 195 in Writing & Language, #66 of 133 in Vision & Documents. Strongest at: Tool calling, Reasoning, Science, Knowledge, Instructions.
Is GLM 5.1 better than Gemini 3.6 Flash?›
On MathArena · ArXivMath · May 2026, GLM 5.1 scores 52.5 vs 54.2 — about the same.
How can I use GLM 5.1?›
Through the API of Alibaba, AtlasCloud, Baidu, Chutes, DeepInfra and 6 more.
What is the context window of GLM 5.1?›
203K tokens, with up to 131K output tokens.
When was GLM 5.1 released? Is there a newer version?›
Released 2026-04-07. It has been superseded by GLM 5.2.
Is GLM 5.1 open source?›
Yes, the weights are open (MIT licence).
Can I run GLM 5.1 locally?›
The weights are open and can be self-hosted; hardware needs are not confirmed yet.
Can GLM 5.1 read images?›
No, it accepts text only.
What is GLM 5.1?›
GLM 5.1 is an open-weights language model from Z.ai, released Apr 2026, the successor to GLM 5.
What are the best alternatives to GLM 5.1?›
Muse Spark 1.3 (cheaper), GPT-6.1 Sol (better), GLM 5.2 (open weights).