Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 40.7 #29 of 337
Knowledge 7
AA OmniscienceAccuracy Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 48.9% #26 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 42.3% #67 of 321
AA Omniscience Index Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 27.3 #16 of 321
IFBench (instructions) Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 58.6% #88 of 248
EQ-Bench3 Judge-rated responses to social and emotionally nuanced scenarios, scored through the source pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,884 #3 of 50
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 51.7% #26 of 83
Mystery Game Puzzles Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 28% #27 of 64
Reasoning 1
Chess Puzzles Models choose the best next move from a novel chess position Epoch 41% #28 of 68
Math 17
AA Analyst Agent Data-analyst tasks: the model explores data with tools and reports findings AA 43.8% #17 of 43
MathArenaAIME 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 95.8% #12 of 24+11 versions & slices HMMT February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 93.9% #9 of 24Apex Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 40.6% #7 of 34Apex Shortlist Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 63.8% #18 of 30ArXivMath · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 57.5% #9 of 17ArXivMath · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 40.6% #11 of 20ArXivMath · January 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 52.2% #14 of 18ArXivMath · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 50.8% #10 of 14BrokenArXiv · April 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 4.1% #15 of 15BrokenArXiv · February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 4% #13 of 15BrokenArXiv · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 5.8% #12 of 13ArXivLean · March 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 14.6% #3 of 5
FrontierMath Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 43.8% #4 of 40
FrontierMath Tier4 Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 22.9% #3 of 33
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 31.7% #25 of 54
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 70.2% #23 of 69
Science 2
Humanity's Last Exam Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 42.3% #36 of 337
CritPt (physics) Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 12% #51 of 324
Coding 7
DeepSWE1.1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition 49.3% #27 of 44+1 versions & slices 1 Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition Datacurve 54.2% #4 of 20
ITBench SRE IT incident tasks: diagnose and fix broken systems like a site-reliability engineer AA 46.7% #10 of 37
WebDev Arena Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,558 #32 of 97+1 versions & slices full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,558 #32 of 97
MirrorCode Agents reimplement software projects by observing their behavior Epoch 31.1% #5 of 9
Terminal-Bench Hard Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 51.5% #11 of 242
Agents 8
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 42.6 #43 of 175
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 1,254 #41 of 140
MCP-Atlas Public MCPAtlas Public: MCPAtlas Public as reported in this launch evaluation; the post is the authority for the recorded task and grading scope 80.8% #2 of 16
τ³-benchbanking · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 3-banking-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 40.2% #6 of 21
EBR Bench Agents learn to play Earthborne Rangers across repeated playthroughs Epoch 19% #17 of 24
Furniture Assembly Models inspect furniture assembly photos, identify incorrect builds and locate the mistaken step Epoch 33.3% #22 of 31
MCP-Atlasfull 1000 Tool orchestration across MCP servers on the stated task split Scale 79.1% #2 of 16
τ³-BankingAA Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 34.6% #26 of 134
Multimodal 3
MMMU-Pro (vision) College-level questions that require understanding images: charts, diagrams, photos AA 78.8% #28 of 127
Arena Vision Human pairwise preferences in the stated vision vote pool Arena 1,317 #5 of 88
Chartography Expert chart reasoning over professional scientific, medical, financial and engineering charts Surge 16.5% #26 of 37
Writing 18
Arena Textcreative writing Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,489 #5 of 195+14 versions & slices overall Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,501 #7 of 196Chinese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,532 #11 of 181English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,496 #10 of 188French Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,503 #7 of 149German Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,495 #8 of 154instruction following Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,498 #7 of 188Japanese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,474 #13 of 138Korean Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,464 #8 of 144non-English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,480 #10 of 188Polish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,489 #9 of 133Russian Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,494 #10 of 186Spanish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,495 #8 of 155overall · full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,490 #11 of 188creative writing · full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,486 #9 of 187
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 81.8% #10 of 95
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,914 #13 of 91
Lech Mazur Short-Story Judges compare stories written to ten required elements; the comparison score can be negative Lech 1.8 #12 of 44
Health & law 5
MLCR-AA Models synthesize long medical records; the headline credits concise answers judged both accurate and complete AA 28.9% #17 of 64
Vals LegalBench Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 85.3% #20 of 89
Vals MedCode Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 54.9% #6 of 78
Vals MedScribe Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 83% #42 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 38.5% #28 of 69
Documents 2
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 78.7% #60 of 275
Arena Document Human pairwise preferences in the stated document vote pool Arena 1,495 #5 of 33
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 12
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 91.4% #25 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 86.4% #50 of 133
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 86.7% #54 of 130
SWE-bench VerifiedEpoch Swe Bench Verified: Agents modify real repositories to resolve the stated Verified issues Epoch 83.5% #1 of 24
SWE-rebenchall · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 53.1% #2 of 5+5 versions & slices Go · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Java · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Python · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 53.1% #2 of 5Rust · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5TypeScript · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5
τ²-benchAA Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 88.6% #48 of 245
Terminal-Bench2.1 Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 83.1% #17 of 156
No benchmark matches
CheaperGPT-6.1 Solmax+34%-60%$0.72Remove unsupported parameters+5
OpenKimi K3max+3%-40%$2.00Sampling parameters are fixed+3
GLM 5.3maxOpen-2%-79%$2.01No image input+4
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813maxOpen-8%-80%$0.67No image input+5