Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Alternatives?
CheaperClaude Sonnet 5.5highwins 66%-41%$0.88No forced tool use+5BetterClaude Haiku 5.5maxwins 58%-86%$0.21Remove sampling parameters+5
OpenQwen3.8 Flashthinkingwins 57%-75%$0.37Context: 1M → 262K+6CheaperClaude Opus 5.5mediumwins 64%-10%$1.34No forced tool use+5
CheaperDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpenwins 57%-82%$0.26Pass back reasoning_content · Chat Completions+4Claude Sonnet 5.5highwins 66%-41%$0.88No forced tool use+5Claude Opus 5.5mediumwins 64%-10%$1.34No forced tool use+5Claude Haiku 5.5maxwins 58%-86%$0.21Remove sampling parameters+5Qwen3.8 FlashthinkingOpenwins 57%-75%$0.37Context: 1M → 262K+6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpenwins 57%-82%$0.26Pass back reasoning_content · Chat Completions+4Claude Haiku 5.5maxwins 58%-86%$0.21Remove sampling parameters+5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpenwins 57%-82%$0.26Pass back reasoning_content · Chat Completions+4Qwen3.8 FlashthinkingOpenwins 57%-75%$0.37Context: 1M → 262K+6
GPT-6.1 Solmaxwins 55%-51%$0.72Remove unsupported parameters+5Claude Sonnet 5.5highwins 66%-41%$0.88No forced tool use+5Qwen3.8 FlashthinkingOpenwins 57%-75%$0.37Context: 1M → 262K+6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpenwins 57%-82%$0.26Pass back reasoning_content · Chat Completions+4
MiMo v2.6 ProthinkingOpensame-91%$0.13Pass back reasoning_content+3
GLM 5.3maxOpenwins 47%+35%$2.01Reasoning cannot be disabled+3
Kimi K3maxOpenwins 47%+34%$2.00Sampling parameters are fixed+3Ling 3.1 FlashOpenwins 33%-32%$1.01Ling 3.0 Flash VLthinkingOpenwins 4%—$0.06 / $0.18Context: 1M → 262KLing 3.0 Flash FinthinkingOpenwins 4%—$0.06 / $0.18Context: 1M → 262KLing 3.0 FlashthinkingOpenwins 2%-98%$0.028Context: 1M → 262KRing 2.6 1TOpenwins 1%-81%$0.29Context: 1M → 128KLing 3.0 TinyOpenwins 0%——Context: 1M → 262KLing 2.6 1TOpenn/a——Context: 1M → 262KLing 2.6 FlashOpenn/a——Context: 1M → 262KAll inclusionAI models →History
5 versionsBenchmarks
in Agents & Tool UseFAQ
How much does Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 cost?›
$0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens; cached input $0.06 per 1M. A typical benchmark task costs about $1.49 at default effort.
Is Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 free to use?›
There is no free API; the cheapest paid price is $0.30 per 1M input tokens.
How good is Ling 3.1 Flash 1019, and what is it best at?›
#30 of 336 in Chat & Knowledge, #22 of 134 in Coding, #8 of 135 in Agents & Tool Use, #48 of 135 in Vision & Documents. Strongest at: Coding, Agents & work tasks, Reasoning, Long context, Knowledge.
Is Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 better than Claude Fable 5?›
On AA-Briefcase 1.1 · Elo, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 1,522.1 vs 1,536.9 — about the same. It is 83% cheaper per task.
How can I use Ling 3.1 Flash 1019?›
Through the inclusionAI API.
What is the context window of Ling 3.1 Flash 1019?›
1M tokens.
When was Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 released? Is there a newer version?›
Released 2026-10-22. It is the current version in its line.
Is Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 open source?›
No, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is a closed model available through an API. The closest open-weights option here is Qwen3.8 Flash.
Can Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 read images?›
No, it accepts text only.
What is Ling 3.1 Flash 1019?›
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is a closed language model from inclusionAI, released Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Ling 3.1 Flash 1019?›
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (cheaper), Claude Haiku 5.5 (better), Qwen3.8 Flash (open weights).