Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 24.7 #87 of 334
Knowledge 18
Arena Text Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,456 #43 of 196+12 versions & slices English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,451 #47 of 188instruction following Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,443 #41 of 188non-English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,431 #44 of 188overall · full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,443 #45 of 188Russian Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,435 #47 of 186Chinese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,495 #43 of 181Spanish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,433 #62 of 155German Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,438 #45 of 154French Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,450 #56 of 149Korean Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,400 #41 of 144Japanese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,453 #18 of 138Polish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,440 #36 of 133
AA Omniscience Index Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 5.4 #49 of 318
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 34.9% #47 of 83
AA OmniscienceAccuracy Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 37.7% #54 of 318+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 51.9% #93 of 318
IFBench (instructions) Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 72.9% #34 of 245
Reasoning 4
ARC-AGI-2semi-private Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 17.6% #42 of 66+1 versions & slices public evaluation Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 18.3% #37 of 63
ARC-AGI-1semi-private Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 72.8% #39 of 64+1 versions & slices public evaluation Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 77.1% #37 of 61
Math 16
MathArenaApex Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 1% #25 of 34+15 versions & slices AIME 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 94.2% #7 of 30Apex Shortlist Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 55.9% #21 of 30HMMT February 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 93.3% #5 of 30BRUMO 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 93.3% #7 of 24SMT 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 91% #4 of 24CMIMC 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 94.4% #3 of 22Kangaroo 2025 1-2 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 65.6% #12 of 17Kangaroo 2025 11-12 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 91.7% #10 of 17Kangaroo 2025 3-4 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 65.6% #10 of 17Kangaroo 2025 5-6 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 61.7% #16 of 17Kangaroo 2025 7-8 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 85.8% #13 of 16Kangaroo 2025 9-10 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 90.8% #15 of 16HMMT November 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 91.7% #5 of 14Project Euler Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 61.6% #7 of 11Putnam 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 48.3% #3 of 3
Science 2
Humanity's Last Exam Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 28.5% #88 of 334
CritPt (physics) Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 4.9% #79 of 321
Health & law 3
Vals LegalBench Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 85.7% #16 of 89
Vals MedScribe Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 88.1% #13 of 80
Vals MedCode Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 52.7% #11 of 78
Documents 1
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 80% #42 of 273
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 2
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 87.3% #55 of 312
AIME2025 · AA archived AA evaluates the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2025 AIME mathematics competition AA 94% #9 of 139
No benchmark matches