Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 AA Intelligence Index 4.3.2: Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 41.8 #26 of 337
Knowledge 7
AA OmniscienceAccuracy AA Omniscience · Accuracy: Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 48.8% #27 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate AA Omniscience · Hallucination Rate: Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 39.3% #59 of 321
AA Omniscience Index AA Omniscience Index: Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 28.8 #14 of 321
IFBench (instructions) IFBench (instructions): Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 62.2% #80 of 248
EQ-Bench3 EQ-Bench 3: Judge-rated responses to social and emotionally nuanced scenarios, scored through the source pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 2,030 #2 of 50
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 SimpleQA Verified v1: Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 53% #21 of 83
Mystery Game Puzzles Mystery Game Puzzles: Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 36% #16 of 64
Reasoning 4
ARC-AGI-1semi-private ARC-AGI-1 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 92% #20 of 64
ARC-AGI-2semi-private ARC-AGI-2 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 72.1% #19 of 66
ARC-AGI-3semi-private ARC-AGI-3 · semi-private: Measures interactive game solving through relative human action efficiency ARC 1.5% #10 of 18
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles: Models choose the best next move from a novel chess position Epoch 52% #13 of 68
Math 26 Leads on 2
AA Analyst Agent AA Analyst Agent: Data-analyst tasks: the model explores data with tools and reports findings AA 45% #15 of 43
MathArenaAIME 2026 MathArena · AIME 2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 100% #1 of 24+20 versions & slices HMMT February 2026 MathArena · HMMT February 2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 95.5% #6 of 24Apex MathArena · apex · Apex: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 81.3% #1 of 34Apex Shortlist MathArena · apex · Apex Shortlist: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 90.4% #4 of 30ArXivMath · April 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 04/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 62.5% #8 of 17ArXivMath · February 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 02/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 60.2% #4 of 20ArXivMath · June 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 70% #13 of 24ArXivMath · March 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 03/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 75% #2 of 14ArXivMath · May 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 05/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 65% #9 of 19BrokenArXiv · April 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 04/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 34.4% #6 of 15BrokenArXiv · February 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 02/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 35.5% #3 of 15BrokenArXiv · June 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 41.7% #15 of 24BrokenArXiv · March 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 03/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 35.7% #3 of 13BrokenArXiv · May 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 05/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 23% #11 of 18ArXivLean · June 2026 MathArena · arxivlean · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 23.9% #4 of 9Kangaroo 2025 1-2 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 1-2: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 70.8% #10 of 17Kangaroo 2025 11-12 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 11-12: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 100% #1 of 17Kangaroo 2025 3-4 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 3-4: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 60.4% #14 of 17Kangaroo 2025 5-6 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 5-6: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 70% #10 of 17Kangaroo 2025 7-8 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 7-8: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 96.7% #1 of 16Kangaroo 2025 9-10 MathArena · kangaroo · Kangaroo 2025 9-10: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 91.7% #13 of 16
FrontierMath FrontierMath: Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 47.2% #3 of 40
FrontierMath Tier4 FrontierMath Tier 4: Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 31.3% #1 of 33
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 56.1% #17 of 54
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 80% #17 of 69
Science 3
Humanity's Last Exam Humanity's Last Exam: Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 48.7% #14 of 337
CritPt (physics) CritPt (physics): Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 20.9% #25 of 324
SciCode SciCode: Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 54.4% #31 of 140
Coding 7
Terminal-Bench4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source setting 2: Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 21.7% #28 of 132+1 versions & slices 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source setting 2: Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 84.6% #12 of 156
DeepSWE1.1 DeepSWE 1.1: Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition 51.8% #25 of 44+1 versions & slices 1 DeepSWE 1: Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition Datacurve 50.7% #4 of 20
WebDev Arena WebDev Arena: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,556 #33 of 97+1 versions & slices full cohort WebDev Arena · snapshot 2026-10-19 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,556 #33 of 97
Terminal-Bench Hard Terminal-Bench Hard (version unstated): Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 58.3% #5 of 242
Agents 9
AutomationBench-AA AutomationBench-AA: Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 45.6% #41 of 133
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo AA-Briefcase 1.1 · Elo: Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 1,321 #36 of 140
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA: Agents complete stateful enterprise workflows in eight domains; final database state determines success AA 44% #14 of 43
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 GDPval-AA (work tasks) 2.1: Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 47.7 #32 of 175
Toolathlon-Verified Toolathlon-Verified: Toolathlon-Verified as reported in this launch evaluation; the post is the authority for the recorded task and grading scope 76.2% #3 of 6
τ³-benchbanking · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 3-banking-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 39.7% #7 of 21
EBR Bench EBR Bench: Agents learn to play Earthborne Rangers across repeated playthroughs Epoch 28.6% #14 of 24
Furniture Assembly Furniture Assembly: Models inspect furniture assembly photos, identify incorrect builds and locate the mistaken step Epoch 42.5% #15 of 31
τ³-BankingAA τ³-Banking · AA: Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 34.2% #30 of 134
Multimodal 2
Chartography Chartography: Expert chart reasoning over professional scientific, medical, financial and engineering charts Surge 15.9% #28 of 37
Arena Vision Arena Vision · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated vision vote pool Arena 1,294 #15 of 88
Writing 18
Arena Textcreative writing Arena Text · creative writing: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,469 #12 of 195+14 versions & slices overall Arena Text · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,481 #19 of 196Chinese Arena Text · chinese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,507 #37 of 181English Arena Text · english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,469 #29 of 188French Arena Text · french: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,481 #23 of 149German Arena Text · german: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,472 #18 of 154instruction following Arena Text · instruction following: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,476 #17 of 188Japanese Arena Text · japanese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,441 #23 of 138Korean Arena Text · korean: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,432 #22 of 144non-English Arena Text · non english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,450 #29 of 188Polish Arena Text · polish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,457 #23 of 133Russian Arena Text · russian: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,474 #20 of 186Spanish Arena Text · spanish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,465 #23 of 155overall · full cohort Arena Text · overall · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,461 #29 of 188creative writing · full cohort Arena Text · creative writing · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,454 #21 of 187
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 80.8% #14 of 95
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,840 #20 of 91
Lech Mazur Short-Story Lech Mazur Short-Story · comparison score: Judges compare stories written to ten required elements; the comparison score can be negative Lech 0.2 #21 of 44
Health & law 5
MLCR-AA MLCR-AA: Models synthesize long medical records; the headline credits concise answers judged both accurate and complete AA 45.6% #10 of 64
Vals LegalBench Vals LegalBench: Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 83.6% #44 of 89
Vals MedCode Vals MedCode: Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 53.2% #8 of 78
Vals MedScribe Vals MedScribe: Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 85.8% #24 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Vals Legal Research Bench: Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 43.8% #18 of 69
Documents 3
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 AA-LCR (long context) 1.1: Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 77.7% #73 of 275
GDP.pdfAA all-pass GDP.pdf · AA all-pass: Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 22.8% #15 of 133
Arena Document Arena Document · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated document vote pool Arena 1,475 #9 of 33
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 10
GPQA Diamond GPQA Diamond: Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 92% #21 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch GPQA Diamond · source setting 2: Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 91% #23 of 133
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024 2025: Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 98.3% #20 of 130
SWE-rebenchall · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · all · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 56.5% #1 of 5+5 versions & slices Go · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · go · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Java · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · java · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Python · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · python · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 56.5% #1 of 5Rust · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · rust · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5TypeScript · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15 SWE-rebench · typescript · 2026-03-01 to 2026-05-15: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5
τ²-benchAA τ²-Bench: Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 94.4% #22 of 245
No benchmark matches
BetterMiMo v2.6 ProthinkingOpen+11%-97%$0.13Pass back reasoning_content+3
CheaperGPT-6 Astramax+26%-20%$3.26Monitoring can return HTTP 403+2
CheaperGemini 4 Argonhigh+26%-51%*$1.99Synchronous output stops at 65,536+2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpen+8%-94%$0.26Pass back reasoning_content · Chat Completions+4
GLM 5.3maxOpen+7%-51%$2.01No image input+4
Step 5 PreviewthinkingOpen+5%-75%$1.03web_search not available · Chat Completions+2
Kimi K3maxOpen+4%-51%$2.00Sampling parameters are fixed+3