Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 18.4 #129 of 337
Knowledge 6
AA OmniscienceAccuracy Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 30.8% #74 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 88.9% #238 of 321
AA Omniscience Index Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA -30.8 #152 of 321
IFBench (instructions) Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 78.8% #8 of 248
EQ-Bench3 Judge-rated responses to social and emotionally nuanced scenarios, scored through the source pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,413 #26 of 50
Mystery Game Puzzles Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 18% #42 of 64
Math 11
MathArenaAIME 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 94.2% #18 of 24+9 versions & slices HMMT February 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 87.9% #16 of 24Apex Shortlist Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 60.1% #19 of 30ArXivMath · December 2025 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 38.2% #10 of 13ArXivMath · January 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 54.9% #11 of 18Kangaroo 2025 1-2 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 81.3% #7 of 17Kangaroo 2025 11-12 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 91.7% #10 of 17Kangaroo 2025 3-4 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 68.8% #6 of 17Kangaroo 2025 5-6 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 74.9% #8 of 17USAMO 2026 Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 36.3% #7 of 8
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 31.2% #57 of 69
Science 3
Humanity's Last Exam Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 29% #85 of 337
CritPt (physics) Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 1.7% #112 of 324
SciCode Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 44.8% #75 of 140
Coding 6
Terminal-Bench4.0 Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 0% #75 of 132+1 versions & slices 2.1 Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 51.3% #69 of 156
ITBench SRE IT incident tasks: diagnose and fix broken systems like a site-reliability engineer AA 34.1% #25 of 37
WebDev Arena Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,400 #69 of 97+1 versions & slices full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,400 #69 of 97
Terminal-Bench Hard Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 40.9% #32 of 242
Agents 7
AutomationBench-AA Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 6.9% #76 of 133
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 562 #92 of 140
APEX-Agents Agents complete long-horizon professional-services tasks across realistic applications AA 15.3% #20 of 29
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Agents complete stateful enterprise workflows in eight domains; final database state determines success AA 30.9% #34 of 43
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 14.6 #99 of 175
τ³-benchbanking · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 3-banking-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 9.8% #20 of 21
τ³-BankingAA Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 13.4% #76 of 134
Multimodal 2
MMMU-Pro (vision) College-level questions that require understanding images: charts, diagrams, photos AA 77.3% #36 of 127
Arena Vision Human pairwise preferences in the stated vision vote pool Arena 1,262 #39 of 88
Writing 17
Arena Textcreative writing Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,406 #61 of 195+14 versions & slices overall Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,442 #61 of 196Chinese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,499 #39 of 181English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,443 #59 of 188French Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,461 #41 of 149German Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,446 #41 of 154instruction following Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,423 #60 of 188Japanese Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,429 #28 of 138Korean Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,383 #57 of 144non-English Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,430 #48 of 188Polish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,449 #29 of 133Russian Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,429 #54 of 186Spanish Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,441 #54 of 155overall · full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,438 #54 of 188creative writing · full cohort Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,402 #59 of 187
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 68.3% #41 of 95
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,478 #52 of 91
Documents 2
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 77.3% #76 of 275
GDP.pdfAA all-pass Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 12.2% #48 of 133
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 14
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 89.3% #44 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 86.4% #51 of 133
τ²-benchairline · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 2-airline-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 81.5% #5 of 6+4 versions & slices overall · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 2-overall-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 87.9% #1 of 6retail · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 2-retail-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 84.4% #1 of 6telecom · 1.0.1 τ-bench official · 2-telecom-1.0.1: Customer-service agents converse with simulated users, retrieve domain knowledge and change state through tools Sierra 97.8% #1 of 6AA Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 95.6% #16 of 245
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 88.9% #49 of 130
SWE-rebenchall · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 59.9% #2 of 5+5 versions & slices Go · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Java · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5Python · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 59.9% #2 of 5Rust · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5TypeScript · 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01 Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 5
No benchmark matches
CheaperGemini 3 Flash Previewunstatedwins 59%-17%$0.50 / $3
BetterGPT-5.6 Lunaxhighwins 55%-67%$0.085
OpenGLM 5.3maxwins 62%+59%$2.01Memory (4-bit): 242 GB → 452 GB+5
CheaperMiMo v2.5 ProunstatedOpenwins 58%-60%$0.43 / $0.87Memory (4-bit): 242 GB → 614 GB+1
Muse Spark 1.2xhighwins 63%+48%$0.97Only auto tool_choice is supported+1