—per task?
price not verifiedprice
—output speed?
—context
Alternatives?
ModelScoreCostPer taskWhat changes
XBetterTeleOCROpen+24%——ABetterOvisOCR2Open+23%—$0.30 / $1.20PBetterPaddleOCR VL 1.6Open+23%——
BetterGLM-OCROpen+21%—$0.20 / $0.20PBetterPaddleOCR VL 1.5Open+21%——ModelScoreCostPer taskWhat changes
Nothing here yet.
ModelScoreCostPer taskWhat changes
XTeleOCROpen+24%——AOvisOCR2Open+23%—$0.30 / $1.20PPaddleOCR VL 1.6Open+23%——GLM-OCROpen+21%—$0.20 / $0.20PPaddleOCR VL 1.5Open+21%——ModelScoreCostPer taskWhat changes
XTeleOCROpen+24%——AOvisOCR2Open+23%—$0.30 / $1.20PPaddleOCR VL 1.6Open+23%——GLM-OCROpen+21%—$0.20 / $0.20PPaddleOCR VL 1.5Open+21%——Benchmarks
in Vision & DocumentsOmniDocBench · v1.6 · full78.4#22
FAQ
How much does Marker cost?›
There is no per-unit API price: price not verified.
How good is Marker, and what is it best at?›
#22 of 22 in Vision & Documents.
Is Marker better than POINTS Reader?›
On OmniDocBench · v1.6 · full, Marker scores 78.4 vs 83.4 — lower.
What is Marker?›
Marker is a language model from datalab-to.
What are the best alternatives to Marker?›
TeleOCR (better).