Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 AA Intelligence Index 4.3.2: Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 25.7 #79 of 337
Knowledge 5
AA OmniscienceAccuracy AA Omniscience · Accuracy: Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 33.2% #64 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate AA Omniscience · Hallucination Rate: Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 63% #115 of 321
AA Omniscience Index AA Omniscience Index: Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA -8.9 #90 of 321
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 SimpleQA Verified v1: Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 19.1% #70 of 83
Mystery Game Puzzles Mystery Game Puzzles: Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 6% #63 of 64
Reasoning 4
ARC-AGI-1public evaluation ARC-AGI-1 · public-eval: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 89.4% #32 of 61+1 versions & slices semi-private ARC-AGI-1 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 84% #35 of 64
ARC-AGI-2public evaluation ARC-AGI-2 · public-eval: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 39.3% #31 of 63+1 versions & slices semi-private ARC-AGI-2 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 40.1% #35 of 66
Math 3
AA Analyst Agent AA Analyst Agent: Data-analyst tasks: the model explores data with tools and reports findings AA 27.5% #27 of 43
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 17.1% #42 of 54
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 46.3% #48 of 69
Science 4
Humanity's Last Exam Humanity's Last Exam: Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 33.3% #72 of 337
CritPt (physics) CritPt (physics): Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 8.3% #68 of 324
SciCode SciCode: Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 49.7% #52 of 140
Terminal-Bench Science0.1 Terminal-Bench Science 0.1: Agents complete expert-authored research workflows across five scientific domains in a terminal AA 0% #27 of 33
Coding 4
Terminal-Bench4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source setting 2: Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 1% #54 of 132+1 versions & slices 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source setting 2: Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 55.1% #62 of 156
WebDev Arena WebDev Arena: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,409 #65 of 97+1 versions & slices full cohort WebDev Arena · snapshot 2026-10-19 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,409 #65 of 97
Agents 5
AutomationBench-AA AutomationBench-AA: Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 4.8% #86 of 133
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo AA-Briefcase 1.1 · Elo: Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 912 #66 of 140
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA: Agents complete stateful enterprise workflows in eight domains; final database state determines success AA 42.7% #17 of 43
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 GDPval-AA (work tasks) 2.1: Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 31.2 #59 of 175
τ³-BankingAA τ³-Banking · AA: Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 18.8% #59 of 134
Multimodal 3
MMMU-Pro (vision) MMMU-Pro (vision): College-level questions that require understanding images: charts, diagrams, photos AA 74% #57 of 127
Arena Vision Arena Vision · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated vision vote pool Arena 1,237 #52 of 88
Chartography Chartography: Expert chart reasoning over professional scientific, medical, financial and engineering charts Surge 9.1% #36 of 37
Writing 16
Arena Textcreative writing Arena Text · creative writing: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,314 #120 of 195+14 versions & slices overall Arena Text · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,404 #94 of 196Chinese Arena Text · chinese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,463 #69 of 181English Arena Text · english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,421 #82 of 188French Arena Text · french: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,433 #73 of 149German Arena Text · german: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,407 #70 of 154instruction following Arena Text · instruction following: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,399 #81 of 188Japanese Arena Text · japanese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,401 #44 of 138Korean Arena Text · korean: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,364 #67 of 144non-English Arena Text · non english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,400 #82 of 188Polish Arena Text · polish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,426 #53 of 133Russian Arena Text · russian: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,391 #89 of 186Spanish Arena Text · spanish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,422 #69 of 155overall · full cohort Arena Text · overall · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,413 #81 of 188creative writing · full cohort Arena Text · creative writing · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,331 #105 of 187
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 1,491 #50 of 91
Health & law 5
Harvey LAB-AA1.1 Harvey LAB-AA 1.1: Legal agents work from case documents; every rubric criterion must pass and material hallucinations receive no credit AA 0% #18 of 23
Vals LegalBench Vals LegalBench: Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 83% #48 of 89
Vals MedCode Vals MedCode: Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 37.9% #57 of 78
Vals MedScribe Vals MedScribe: Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 84.1% #33 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Vals Legal Research Bench: Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 25.5% #45 of 69
Documents 2
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 AA-LCR (long context) 1.1: Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 75.7% #86 of 275
GDP.pdfAA all-pass GDP.pdf · AA all-pass: Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 11.2% #52 of 133
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 3
GPQA Diamond GPQA Diamond: Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 89.5% #41 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch GPQA Diamond · source setting 2: Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 88.5% #40 of 133
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024 2025: Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 90% #47 of 130
No benchmark matches
CheaperGPT-6 Lunamax+49%-24%$0.068Function calling only with none · Chat Completions+3
OpenStep 5 Previewthinking+70%+1,047%$1.03Memory (4-bit): 160 GB → 363 GB+3
CheaperMiMo v2.6 FlashthinkingOpen+48%-30%$0.062Memory (4-bit): 160 GB → 186 GB+4
CheaperClaude Haiku 5.5high+47%-11%$0.079Remove sampling parameters+5
CheaperAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta+37%-76%$0.10 / $0.30
GLM 5.3 FlashmaxOpen+63%+217%$0.28Memory (4-bit): 160 GB → 193 GB+5
Ling 3.1 FlashOpen+60%+1,017%$1.00Memory (4-bit): 160 GB → 343 GB+1
Qwen3.8 FlashthinkingOpen+55%+316%$0.37max_tokens range · QwenCloud+5