Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 AA Intelligence Index 4.3.2: Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 45.8 #15 of 337
Knowledge 5 Leads on 1
AA OmniscienceAccuracy AA Omniscience · Accuracy: Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 59.5% #6 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate AA Omniscience · Hallucination Rate: Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 46.9% #77 of 321
AA Omniscience Index AA Omniscience Index: Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA 40.6 #6 of 321
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 SimpleQA Verified v1: Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 75.8% #3 of 83
Mystery Game Puzzles Mystery Game Puzzles: Models choose the best move in puzzle positions from an undisclosed game Epoch 84% #1 of 64
Reasoning 6 Leads on 1
ARC-AGI-1public evaluation ARC-AGI-1 · public-eval: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 98.3% #7 of 61+1 versions & slices semi-private ARC-AGI-1 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 96.5% #10 of 64
ARC-AGI-2public evaluation ARC-AGI-2 · public-eval: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 94.2% #7 of 63+1 versions & slices semi-private ARC-AGI-2 · semi-private: Models infer transformations from examples and solve unseen grid puzzles; the evaluation split is explicit ARC 85.4% #10 of 66
ARC-AGI-3semi-private ARC-AGI-3 · semi-private: Measures interactive game solving through relative human action efficiency ARC 17.5% #4 of 18
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles: Models choose the best next move from a novel chess position Epoch 74% #1 of 68
Math 14 Leads on 2
AA Analyst Agent AA Analyst Agent: Data-analyst tasks: the model explores data with tools and reports findings AA 51.3% #7 of 43
FrontierMath Erdos FrontierMath Erdos: Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 2.9% #2 of 13
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 87.8% #5 of 54
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2) FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 93.7% #1 of 69
MathArenaArXivMath · April 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 04/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 90.8% #1 of 17+9 versions & slices ArXivMath · August 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 08/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 85.1% #5 of 12ArXivMath · June 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 84.4% #6 of 24ArXivMath · May 2026 MathArena · arxiv · 05/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 88.8% #3 of 19BrokenArXiv · April 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 04/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 97.5% #1 of 15BrokenArXiv · August 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 08/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 74.7% #5 of 12BrokenArXiv · June 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 97.7% #3 of 24BrokenArXiv · May 2026 MathArena · arxiv_false · 05/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 88.5% #3 of 18ArXivLean · June 2026 MathArena · arxivlean · 06/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 65.2% #1 of 9ArXivLean · September 2026 MathArena · arxivlean · 09/2026: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 37.7% #3 of 5
Science 5 Leads on 2
Humanity's Last Exam Humanity's Last Exam: Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 49.2% #12 of 337
CritPt (physics) CritPt (physics): Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 26.3% #17 of 324
Vals Science Index Vals Science Index: Scientific problem solving across the index’s component evaluations Vals 65.1% #1 of 18
SciCode SciCode: Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 54.1% #33 of 140
Terminal-Bench Science0.1 Terminal-Bench Science 0.1: Agents complete expert-authored research workflows across five scientific domains in a terminal AA 63.3% #1 of 33
Coding 10
Terminal-Bench4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source setting 2: Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 41.9% #11 of 132+1 versions & slices 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source setting 2: Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 88% #6 of 156
DeepSWE1.1 DeepSWE 1.1: Agents change repository code to resolve software engineering tasks under the stated DeepSWE edition 67% #15 of 44
FrontierCode1.1 FrontierCode 1.1: Agents implement changes in real repositories, graded against maintainer-defined requirements AA 47% #4 of 28
ITBench SRE ITBench SRE: IT incident tasks: diagnose and fix broken systems like a site-reliability engineer AA 48.6% #8 of 37
WebDev Arena WebDev Arena: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,774 #2 of 97+1 versions & slices full cohort WebDev Arena · snapshot 2026-10-19 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated webdev vote pool Arena 1,774 #2 of 97
SWE-bench Pro (v2 full) SWE-bench Pro (v2 full): Agents resolve repository issues under the network-locked v2 protocol; full and 51-task Hard results are separate Scale 96.9% #5 of 16
SWE-bench Pro (v2 hard) SWE-bench Pro (v2 hard): Agents resolve repository issues under the network-locked v2 protocol; full and 51-task Hard results are separate Scale 90.2% #4 of 16
MirrorCode MirrorCode: Agents reimplement software projects by observing their behavior Epoch 46.7% #4 of 9
Agents 10 Leads on 3
AutomationBench-AA AutomationBench-AA: Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 59.1% #21 of 133
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo AA-Briefcase 1.1 · Elo: Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 1,257 #39 of 140
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 GDPval-AA (work tasks) 2.1: Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 44.5 #39 of 175
AutomationBenchZapier run AutomationBench · Zapier run: End-to-end completion of business workflows using real SaaS applications Zapier 41.4% #2 of 2
EBR Bench EBR Bench: Agents learn to play Earthborne Rangers across repeated playthroughs Epoch 76.2% #1 of 24
Furniture Assembly Furniture Assembly: Models inspect furniture assembly photos, identify incorrect builds and locate the mistaken step Epoch 80% #2 of 31
SpireClimb SpireClimb: Agents play Slay the Spire under the named game and difficulty setting Epoch 25.7% #1 of 7
SpireClimb StS1 A20 Heart SpireClimb StS1 A20 Heart: Agents play Slay the Spire under the named game and difficulty setting Epoch 16.7% #2 of 7
SpireClimb StS2 A10 SpireClimb StS2 A10: Agents play Slay the Spire under the named game and difficulty setting Epoch 34.7% #1 of 7
τ³-BankingAA τ³-Banking · AA: Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 32% #31 of 134
Multimodal 3
MMMU-Pro (vision) MMMU-Pro (vision): College-level questions that require understanding images: charts, diagrams, photos AA 84.6% #5 of 127
Arena Vision Arena Vision · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated vision vote pool Arena 1,280 #25 of 88
Chartography Chartography: Expert chart reasoning over professional scientific, medical, financial and engineering charts Surge 71% #2 of 37
Writing 18 Leads on 1
Arena Textcreative writing Arena Text · creative writing: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,450 #26 of 195+14 versions & slices overall Arena Text · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,477 #23 of 196Chinese Arena Text · chinese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,493 #46 of 181English Arena Text · english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,448 #52 of 188French Arena Text · french: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,444 #64 of 149German Arena Text · german: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,457 #31 of 154instruction following Arena Text · instruction following: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,455 #34 of 188Japanese Arena Text · japanese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,392 #51 of 138Korean Arena Text · korean: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,430 #24 of 144non-English Arena Text · non english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,432 #43 of 188Polish Arena Text · polish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,420 #57 of 133Russian Arena Text · russian: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,437 #44 of 186Spanish Arena Text · spanish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,423 #68 of 155overall · full cohort Arena Text · overall · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,443 #46 of 188creative writing · full cohort Arena Text · creative writing · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,421 #44 of 187
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing1.11 Longform Creative Writing 1.11: Models plan, revise and write a story across eight turns, graded with a writing rubric EQ-Bench 82.8% #6 of 95
EQ-Bench Creative Writingv3 Creative Writing v3 · Elo: Judge-rated creative writing under the v3 prompt set and pairwise ranking EQ-Bench 2,173 #1 of 91
Lech Mazur Short-Story Lech Mazur Short-Story · comparison score: Judges compare stories written to ten required elements; the comparison score can be negative Lech 3.4 #4 of 44
Health & law 5
Harvey LAB-AA1.1 Harvey LAB-AA 1.1: Legal agents work from case documents; every rubric criterion must pass and material hallucinations receive no credit AA 8.6% #5 of 23
MLCR-AA MLCR-AA: Models synthesize long medical records; the headline credits concise answers judged both accurate and complete AA 35% #13 of 64
Vals MedCode Vals MedCode: Medical coding accuracy on patient encounters Vals 48.5% #25 of 78
Vals MedScribe Vals MedScribe: Accuracy of clinical notes produced from consultation transcripts Vals 87.9% #15 of 80
Vals Legal Research Bench Vals Legal Research Bench: Grounded legal research; a task passes only if all criteria pass Vals 39.4% #26 of 69
Documents 3
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 AA-LCR (long context) 1.1: Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 80% #41 of 275
GDP.pdfAA all-pass GDP.pdf · AA all-pass: Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 30.4% #4 of 133
Arena Document Arena Document · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated document vote pool Arena 1,468 #13 of 33
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 3
GPQA Diamond GPQA Diamond: Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 93.1% #11 of 315+1 versions & slices Epoch GPQA Diamond · source setting 2: Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 95.8% #2 of 133
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024 2025: Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 100% #1 of 130
No benchmark matches
OpenMiMo v2.6 Prothinkingsame-84%$0.13Context: 1.05M → 1M+4
CheaperClaude Opus 5.5lowsame-33%$0.55Context: 1.05M → 1M+6
CheaperMiniMax M3.1 Flashthinking-3%-73%$0.22Context: 1.05M → 1M+1
Gemini 4 Argonhigh+16%+143%*$1.99Context: 1.05M → 1M+3
Kimi K3maxOpen-5%+145%$2.00Context: 1.05M → 1M+4
Step 5 PreviewthinkingOpen-6%+26%$1.03Context: 1.05M → 1M+4
Muse Spark OpenxhighOpen-11%+3%$0.84Context: 1.05M → 1M+2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxOpen-12%-68%$0.26Context: 1.05M → 1M+5