Benchmark By Score Rank
Overall 1
AA Intelligence Index4.3.2 AA Intelligence Index 4.3.2: Artificial Analysis combines tests of knowledge, reasoning, coding and tool use into one score AA 8.5 #238 of 337
Knowledge 5
AA OmniscienceAccuracy AA Omniscience · Accuracy: Measures correct answers on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 25.5% #108 of 321+1 versions & slices Hallucination Rate AA Omniscience · Hallucination Rate: Measures how often attempted answers are incorrect on the AA Omniscience factual knowledge test AA 90% #251 of 321
AA Omniscience Index AA Omniscience Index: Scores factual knowledge while penalizing incorrect answers to encourage admitting uncertainty AA -41.7 #180 of 321
IFBench (instructions) IFBench (instructions): Checks whether the model follows precise formatting and content instructions AA 34.8% #186 of 248
SimpleQA Verifiedv1 SimpleQA Verified v1: Accuracy on short factual questions with verified answers, answered without web access 27.4% #62 of 83
Math 2
FrontierMath FrontierMath: Models solve expert-written advanced mathematics problems on the named tier and edition Epoch 1.7% #36 of 40
MATH Level5 MATH Level 5: Models solve competition mathematics problems from the hardest MATH difficulty level Epoch 64.9% #16 of 35
Science 3
Humanity's Last Exam Humanity's Last Exam: Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models AA 2.9% #332 of 337
CritPt (physics) CritPt (physics): Research-level physics problems that need many careful reasoning steps AA 0% #180 of 324
SciCode SciCode: Writing code for real scientific computing problems (physics, biology, math) AA 35.8% #116 of 140
Coding 9
Terminal-Bench4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source setting 2: Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite 0% #75 of 132+1 versions & slices 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source setting 2: Older, easier version of Terminal-Bench; Still widely reported AA 16.9% #116 of 156
SWE-rebenchall · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · all · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 23.3% #4 of 6+5 versions & slices Go · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · go · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 6Java · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · java · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 6Python · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · python · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 23.3% #4 of 6Rust · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · rust · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 6TypeScript · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01 SWE-rebench · typescript · 2025-01-01 to 2025-08-01: Repository issue resolution over the exact fresh pull-request window, under the source agent version Nebius 0% #1 of 6
Terminal-Bench Hard Terminal-Bench Hard (version unstated): Agents solve difficult software, system-administration and data-processing tasks in a terminal AA 6.8% #144 of 242
Agents 4
AutomationBench-AA AutomationBench-AA: Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation AA 0.6% #117 of 133
AA-Briefcase1.1 · Elo AA-Briefcase 1.1 · Elo: Agents produce professional deliverables; blind pairwise comparisons produce the source Elo rating AA 77.7 #123 of 140
GDPval-AA (work tasks)2.1 GDPval-AA (work tasks) 2.1: Real work tasks from many professions (reports, spreadsheets, analyses), graded against expert work AA 0 #122 of 175
τ³-BankingAA τ³-Banking · AA: Agents retrieve banking knowledge and execute tools to resolve customer-support workflows AA 4.7% #123 of 134
Writing 14
Arena Textcreative writing Arena Text · creative writing: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,349 #102 of 195+13 versions & slices overall Arena Text · overall: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,358 #118 of 196Chinese Arena Text · chinese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,338 #130 of 181English Arena Text · english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,346 #134 of 188French Arena Text · french: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,343 #111 of 149German Arena Text · german: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,324 #108 of 154instruction following Arena Text · instruction following: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,315 #124 of 188Japanese Arena Text · japanese: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,266 #96 of 138Korean Arena Text · korean: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,248 #110 of 144non-English Arena Text · non english: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,316 #126 of 188Russian Arena Text · russian: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,324 #123 of 186Spanish Arena Text · spanish: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,352 #114 of 155overall · full cohort Arena Text · overall · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,332 #130 of 188creative writing · full cohort Arena Text · creative writing · snapshot 2026-10-15 · native board settings: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool Arena 1,329 #107 of 187
Health & law 2
Vals LegalBench Vals LegalBench: Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 80.8% #61 of 89+1 versions & slices DeepSeek V3 March 2025 Vals LegalBench · Vals default evaluation · historical run: Legal reasoning and legal-language understanding on LegalBench Vals 77.7% #1 of 1
Documents 2
GDP.pdfAA all-pass GDP.pdf · AA all-pass: Models reason over professional PDF documents; an attempt passes only when every atomic criterion passes 0.8% #122 of 133
AA-LCR (long context)1.1 AA-LCR (long context) 1.1: Questions that need reading and connecting facts across very long documents (around 100K tokens) AA 29.3% #221 of 275
Legacy · saturated or no longer reported 11
AIME2025 · AA archived AIME 2025 · AA archived: AA evaluates the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2025 AIME mathematics competition AA 26% #109 of 140
LiveCodeBenchAA archived LiveCodeBench · AA archived: AA evaluates solutions to newly collected competitive-programming problems AA 35.9% #109 of 153+1 versions & slices official artifact (through April 2025) LiveCodeBench · official artifact (through April 2025): Mean pass@1 over each model’s available problems in the current official public generation artifact; its latest problem is dated April 7, 2025 LiveCodeBench 49.6% #8 of 10
GPQA Diamond GPQA Diamond: Graduate-level biology, chemistry and physics questions that can’t be solved by a quick web search 55.7% #246 of 315+2 versions & slices Epoch GPQA Diamond · source setting 2: Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 71.2% #79 of 133January 2025 run GPQA Diamond · Epoch independent run · historical run: Models answer graduate-level science multiple-choice questions Epoch 56.5% #1 of 1
OTIS Mock AIME 20242025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024 2025: Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 48.9% #93 of 130+1 versions & slices 2025 · February 2025 run OTIS Mock AIME 2024 2025 · Epoch independent run · historical run: Models solve the stated OTIS mock AIME mathematics problems Epoch 15.8% #1 of 1
MathArenaAIME 2025 MathArena · aime · AIME 2025: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 25% #29 of 30+1 versions & slices HMMT February 2025 MathArena · hmmt · HMMT Feb 2025: Answer accuracy on the named mathematics competition under the recorded effort MathArena 13.3% #29 of 30
τ²-benchAA τ²-Bench: Tests service agents that use tools while coordinating with a simulated user AA 22.8% #180 of 245
No benchmark matches
CheaperAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta×4.2-52%$0.10 / $0.30
BetterGPT-6 Lunalow×2.5-77%$0.005Function calling only with none · Chat Completions+3
OpenMiMo v2.6 Prothinking×5.5+574%$0.13Memory (4-bit): 411 GB → 615 GB+4
CheaperLing 3.0 Flash VLthinkingOpen×2.9-71%$0.06 / $0.18
Mistral Small 4thinkingOpen+33%-24%$0.015
Granite 4.2 8BthinkingOpen+31%+19%$0.024
GLM 5.3maxOpen×5.3+10,054%$2.01Memory (4-bit): 411 GB → 452 GB+4
Step 5 PreviewthinkingOpen×5.2+5,097%$1.03web_search not available · Chat Completions+2