Ling 2.6 1T vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Wins 0 of 3 benchmarks
$1.00 / task
Wins 1 of 3 benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam Humanity's Last Exam: Very hard expert questions across many fields, written to stump today’s models
Ling 2.6 1T8.7
Ling 3.1 Flash39.4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source setting 2: Agents use a terminal to complete executable coding, system administration and research tasks in the 4.0 suite
Ling 2.6 1T—
Ling 3.1 Flash33.3
AutomationBench-AA AutomationBench-AA: Agents orchestrate SaaS workflows through APIs; objectives receive credit only when the task has no guardrail violation
Ling 2.6 1T—
Ling 3.1 Flash61.7

Specs

SpecLing 2.6 1TLing 3.1 Flash
Input, per 1M—$0.30
Output, per 1M—$0.90
Cost per task?—$1.00
Speed, tok/s—145
Context262K1M
WeightsOpenOpen
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
Memory (4-bit)615 GB343 GB
LicenceMITMIT
Commercial useAllowedAllowed
See images——
Read PDFs——
Hear audio——
Watch video——
Call tools✓✓
Force a tool call?Partial
Return strict JSONPartial✓
Search the web??
Run code??
Use a computer??

What breaks when you switch

Ling 2.6 1T → Ling 3.1 Flash
Nothing known.
Ling 3.1 Flash → Ling 2.6 1T
Context: 1M → 262K
Memory (4-bit): 343 GB → 615 GB