Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Wonder Full

$0.88 / task
Wins 0 of 2 benchmarks
Wins 1 of 2 benchmarks
Arena Text · creative writing Arena Text · creative writing: Human pairwise preferences in the stated text vote pool
Sonnet 5.5 · xhigh1,465
Muse Wonder Full—
Harvey LAB-AA 1.1 Harvey LAB-AA 1.1: Legal agents work from case documents; every rubric criterion must pass and material hallucinations receive no credit
Sonnet 5.5 · max2.8
Muse Wonder Full13.1

Specs

SpecSonnet 5.5Muse Wonder Full
Input, per 1M$2—
Output, per 1M$10—
Cost per task?$0.88—
Speed, tok/s106—
Context1M1M
WeightsClosedClosed
ReleasedSep 2026Oct 2026
See images✓✓
Read PDFs✓?
Hear audio—✓
Watch video—✓
Call tools✓✓
Force a tool call—?
Return strict JSON✓?
Search the web✓?
Run code✓?
Use a computer✓?

What breaks when you switch

Sonnet 5.5 → Muse Wonder Full
Only in Muse Code›

Muse Wonder Full requires a Muse Code subscription; max reasoning effort on the Model API Wonder model does not select Full.

Muse Wonder Full → Sonnet 5.5
No forced tool use›

Forced tool_choice any or tool returns HTTP 400; remove the forced choice.

Replace disabled thinking›

Disabled thinking returns HTTP 400; use between_tools for the lowest thinking setting.

No manual thinking budgets›

Manual thinking budgets and extra between_tools fields return HTTP 400; remove manual budgets and send between_tools without display, budget_tokens or block_binding.

Remove sampling parameters›

Non-default temperature, top_p or top_k returns HTTP 400; remove these parameters.

No assistant prefill›

A prefilled final assistant turn returns HTTP 400; remove that prefill.

Old computer tool rejected · Claude API / Google Cloud›

The computer_20251124 tool returns HTTP 400 on the Claude API and Google Cloud; use computer_toolset_20260801 there.